William Scull v. Dhs
William Scull v. Dhs
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ WILLIAM E. SCULL, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Respondent. ______________________ 2012-3174 ______________________ Petition for review of Merit Systems Protection Board in No. SF0752090565-B-2. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ RONALD P. ACKERMAN, Law Office of Ronald P. Ackerman, of Culver City, California, argued for petition- er.
SONIA M. ORFIELD, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litiga- tion Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With her on the brief were STUART F. DELERY, Acting Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Director, and SCOTT D. AUSTIN, Assistant Director. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, BRYSON, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
June 13, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.