Terry L. Farmer appeals a final judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“Veterans Court”) affirming a decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (“board”) that denied his claim for disability compensation for post-traumatic stress disorder (“PTSD”) and a seizure disorder. See Farmer v. Shinseki, No. 10-2483, 515 Fed.Appx. 888, 2013 WL 2929631 (Feb. 13, 2012). Before the board, Farmer alleged that he incurred both the PTSD and the seizure disorder when he was kicked in the head by his drill instructor during basic training at Camp Pendleton in San Diego, California. The board determined, however, that there was “no credible supporting evidence that the claimed [in-service] trauma, a head injury, occurred.”

On appeal, Farmer argues that the Veterans Court erred by not remanding his appeal to the board with instructions to *889 apply 38 C.F.R. § 3.304(f)(3) * to his claim. Farmer asserts that he is entitled to rely on section 3.304(f)(3)’s relaxed evidentiary standard because his alleged PTSD stres-sor was “related to [his] fear of hostile military or terrorist activity.” As we recently held in Hall v. Shinseki, however, section 3.304(f)(3) applies “only if a veteran’s claimed in-service PTSD stressor relates to an event or circumstance that a veteran experienced, witnessed, or was confronted with and that was perpetrated by a member of an enemy military or by a terrorist.” No. 2012-7115, 717 F.3d 1369, 1372, 2013 WL 2450628, at * 2 (Fed. Cir. June 7, 2013) (footnote omitted). Because the alleged assault by Farmer’s drill instructor was not “perpetrated by a member of an enemy military or by a terrorist,” id., the board was not required to apply section 3.304(f)(3) in determining whether or not Farmer’s PTSD was incurred in service. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.

AFFIRMED