Tahir Mahmood v. Research in Motion
Tahir Mahmood v. Research in Motion
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
TAHIR MAHMOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
RESEARCH IN MOTION, LTD., Defendant-Appellee. ______________________
2012-1517 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 11-CV-5345, Judge Katherine B. Forrest.
----------------------
TAHIR MAHMOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
RESEARCH IN MOTION, LTD., Defendant-Appellee. ______________________
2013-1062 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 12-CV-0899, Judge Katherine B. Forrest.
______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
RONALD M. DAIGNAULT, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, L.L.P., of New York, New York, argued for plain- tiff-appellant. With him on the brief were RONALD J. SCHUTZ, DAVID LEICHTMAN and ANNIE HUANG.
PAUL B. KELLER, Allen & Overy, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were MICHAEL S. FELDBERG and LAURA R. HALL. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, PLAGER, and TARANTO, Circuit Judge).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
June 18, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished