Tahir Mahmood v. Research in Motion

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Tahir Mahmood v. Research in Motion

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

TAHIR MAHMOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

RESEARCH IN MOTION, LTD., Defendant-Appellee. ______________________

2012-1517 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 11-CV-5345, Judge Katherine B. Forrest.

----------------------

TAHIR MAHMOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

RESEARCH IN MOTION, LTD., Defendant-Appellee. ______________________

2013-1062 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 12-CV-0899, Judge Katherine B. Forrest.

______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

RONALD M. DAIGNAULT, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, L.L.P., of New York, New York, argued for plain- tiff-appellant. With him on the brief were RONALD J. SCHUTZ, DAVID LEICHTMAN and ANNIE HUANG.

PAUL B. KELLER, Allen & Overy, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were MICHAEL S. FELDBERG and LAURA R. HALL. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, PLAGER, and TARANTO, Circuit Judge).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 18, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk

Reference

Status
Unpublished