Convolve v. Compaq
Convolve v. Compaq
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ July 2, 2013 ERRATA ______________________ Appeal No. 2012-1074
CONVOLVE, INC. AND MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Paintiffs-Appellants, v. COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, AND
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, LLC AND SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendants-Appellees.
Decided: July 1, 2013 Nonprecedential Opinion ______________________ Please make the following change: Page 2, changes “CHRISTOPHER D. LANDGRAFF, Bartlit Beck Her- man Palenchar & Scott LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was MARK E. FERGUSON. Of counsel was VINCENT BUCCOLA, Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, of Chicago, Illinois; CARTER G. PHILLIPS and ROBERT N. HOCHMAN, Sidley Austin LLP, of Washington, DC; NATALIA V. BLINKOVA and BLAIR M. JACOBS, McDermott, Will & Emery LLP, of Washington, DC.” to “CHRISTOPHER D. LANDGRAFF, Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellee Compaq Computer Corporation. With him on the brief was MARK E. FERGUSON.
CARTER G. PHILLIPS, Sidley Austin LLP, of Washing- ton, DC, argued for defendants-appellees Seagate Tech- nology, LLC, et al. With him on the brief was ROBERT N.
HOCHMAN. Of counsel on the brief were NATALIA V. BLINKOVA and BLAIR M. JACOBS, McDermott, Will & Emery LLP, of Washington, DC.”
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.