Convolve v. Compaq
Convolve v. Compaq
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
July 2, 2013
ERRATA ______________________
Appeal No. 2012-1074
CONVOLVE, INC. AND MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee,
AND
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, LLC AND SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendants-Appellees.
Decided: July 1, 2013 Nonprecedential Opinion ______________________
Please make the following changes:
“CHRISTOPHER D. LANDGRAFF, Bartlit Beck Her- man Palenchar & Scott LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was MARK E. FERGUSON. Of counsel was VINCENT BUCCOLA, Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, of Chicago, Illinois; CARTER G. PHILLIPS and ROBERT N. HOCHMAN, Sidley Austin LLP, of Washington, DC; NATALIA V. BLINKOVA and BLAIR M. JACOBS, McDermott, Will & Emery LLP, of Washington, DC.” to
“CHRISTOPHER D. LANDGRAFF, Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellee Compaq Computer Corporation. With him on the brief was MARK E. FERGUSON.
CARTER G. PHILLIPS, Sidley Austin LLP, of Washing- ton, DC, argued for defendants-appellees Seagate Tech- nology, LLC, et al. With him on the brief was ROBERT N. HOCHMAN. Of counsel on the brief were NATALIA V. BLINKOVA and BLAIR M. JACOBS, McDermott, Will & Emery LLP, of Washington, DC.”
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished