Convolve v. Compaq

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Convolve v. Compaq

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

July 2, 2013

ERRATA ______________________

Appeal No. 2012-1074

CONVOLVE, INC. AND MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee,

AND

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, LLC AND SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendants-Appellees.

Decided: July 1, 2013 Nonprecedential Opinion ______________________

Please make the following changes:

“CHRISTOPHER D. LANDGRAFF, Bartlit Beck Her- man Palenchar & Scott LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was MARK E. FERGUSON. Of counsel was VINCENT BUCCOLA, Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, of Chicago, Illinois; CARTER G. PHILLIPS and ROBERT N. HOCHMAN, Sidley Austin LLP, of Washington, DC; NATALIA V. BLINKOVA and BLAIR M. JACOBS, McDermott, Will & Emery LLP, of Washington, DC.” to

“CHRISTOPHER D. LANDGRAFF, Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellee Compaq Computer Corporation. With him on the brief was MARK E. FERGUSON.

CARTER G. PHILLIPS, Sidley Austin LLP, of Washing- ton, DC, argued for defendants-appellees Seagate Tech- nology, LLC, et al. With him on the brief was ROBERT N. HOCHMAN. Of counsel on the brief were NATALIA V. BLINKOVA and BLAIR M. JACOBS, McDermott, Will & Emery LLP, of Washington, DC.”

Reference

Status
Unpublished