Case: 13-1305 Document: 37 Page: 1 Filed: 07/02/2013

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY & MATERIALS CO., LTD., BEIJING GANG YAN DIAMOND PRODUCTS COMPANY, AND GANG YAN DIAMOND PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

AND

BOSUN TOOLS GROUPS CO., LTD., Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant,

AND

DIAMOND SAWBLADES MANUFACTURERS COALITION, Defendant-Appellee,

AND

WEIHAI XIANGGUANG MECHANICAL INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD. AND QINGDAO SHINHAN DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., Defendants. Case: 13-1305 Document: 37 Page: 2 Filed: 07/02/2013

2 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY v. US

______________________

2013-1305 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in consolidated Nos. 09-CV-0511 and 06-CV-0246, Senior Judge R. Kenton Musgrave. -------------------------------------------

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY & MATERIALS CO., LTD., BEIJING GANG YAN DIAMOND PRODUCTS COMPANY, AND GANG YAN DIAMOND PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiffs,

AND

UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant,

AND

BOSUN TOOLS GROUPS CO., LTD., Plaintiff,

v.

DIAMOND SAWBLADES MANUFACTURERS COALITION, Defendant-Appellee,

AND

WEIHAI XIANGGUANG MECHANICAL INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD. AND QINGDAO SHINHAN DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., Defendants. Case: 13-1305 Document: 37 Page: 3 Filed: 07/02/2013

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY v. US 3

______________________

2013-1423 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in consolidated Nos. 09-CV-0511 and 06-CV-0246, Senior Judge R. Kenton Musgrave. ______________________

ON MOTION ______________________ ORDER The United States moves without opposition to revise the caption to designate the United States as “defendant- appellant” in appeal No. 2013-1423. The United States also moves without opposition to withdraw appeal no. 2013-1423. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion to reform the caption in appeal No. 2013-1423 is granted. The revised official caption for appeal No. 2013-1423 is reflected above. (2) The motion to withdraw appeal No. 2013-1423 is granted. The appeal is dismissed. (3) Each side shall bear its own costs in appeal No. 2013-1423. (4) The revised official caption for 2013-1305 is re- flected above. (5) All other pending motions are denied as moot. Case: 13-1305 Document: 37 Page: 4 Filed: 07/02/2013

4 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY v. US

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk s25 ISSUED AS A MANDATE (As To 2013-1423 Only): July 2, 2013