Speed v. United States
Speed v. United States
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
CONSTANCE R. SPEED, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. ______________________
2013-5079 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 10-CV-0125, Judge Charles F. Lettow. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
VICTORIA PLANTE-NORTHINGTON, Plante Law Firm, P.C. of Houston, Texas, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
TARA K. HOGAN, Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Depart- ment of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant- appellee. With her on the brief were STUART F. DELERY, Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Direc- tor, and MARTIN F. HOCKEY, JR., Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was MORGAN E. REHRIG, Attorney, Office of General Counsel, United States Postal Service, of Washington, DC. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, PROST, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
January 9, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished