Speed v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Speed v. United States

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

CONSTANCE R. SPEED, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. ______________________

2013-5079 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 10-CV-0125, Judge Charles F. Lettow. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

VICTORIA PLANTE-NORTHINGTON, Plante Law Firm, P.C. of Houston, Texas, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

TARA K. HOGAN, Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Depart- ment of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant- appellee. With her on the brief were STUART F. DELERY, Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Direc- tor, and MARTIN F. HOCKEY, JR., Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was MORGAN E. REHRIG, Attorney, Office of General Counsel, United States Postal Service, of Washington, DC. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, PROST, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 9, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished