Ak Steel Corporation v. United States
Ak Steel Corporation v. United States
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
AK STEEL CORPORATION, Plaintiff,
AND
ALLEGHENY LUDLUM CORPORATION AND NORTH AMERICAN STAINLESS, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee,
AND
OUTOKUMPU MEXINOX S.A. DE C.V. (formerly known as Thyssenkrupp Mexinox S.A. de C.V.) AND MEXINOX USA, INC., Defendants-Appellees. ______________________
2013-1136 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in No. 11-CV-0366, Senior Judge Nicholas Tsou- calas. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________
KATHLEEN W. CANNON, Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With her on the brief were DAVID A. HARTQUIST and R. ALAN LUBERDA. Of counsel was Grace W. Kim.
KARL S. VON SCHRILTZ, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee United States. With him on the brief were PAUL R. BARDOS, Acting General Counsel, and NEAL J. REYNOLDS, Assis- tant General Counsel for Litigation.
CRAIG A. LEWIS, Hogan Lovells US LLP, of Washing- ton, DC, argued for defendants-appellees Outokumpu Mexinox S.A. de C.V., et al. With him on the brief were LEWIS E. LEIBOWITZ and WESLEY V. CARRINGTON. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, WALLACH, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
January 9, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished