Ak Steel Corporation v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Ak Steel Corporation v. United States

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

AK STEEL CORPORATION, Plaintiff,

AND

ALLEGHENY LUDLUM CORPORATION AND NORTH AMERICAN STAINLESS, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee,

AND

OUTOKUMPU MEXINOX S.A. DE C.V. (formerly known as Thyssenkrupp Mexinox S.A. de C.V.) AND MEXINOX USA, INC., Defendants-Appellees. ______________________

2013-1136 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in No. 11-CV-0366, Senior Judge Nicholas Tsou- calas. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________

KATHLEEN W. CANNON, Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With her on the brief were DAVID A. HARTQUIST and R. ALAN LUBERDA. Of counsel was Grace W. Kim.

KARL S. VON SCHRILTZ, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee United States. With him on the brief were PAUL R. BARDOS, Acting General Counsel, and NEAL J. REYNOLDS, Assis- tant General Counsel for Litigation.

CRAIG A. LEWIS, Hogan Lovells US LLP, of Washing- ton, DC, argued for defendants-appellees Outokumpu Mexinox S.A. de C.V., et al. With him on the brief were LEWIS E. LEIBOWITZ and WESLEY V. CARRINGTON. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, WALLACH, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 9, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished