NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IN RE VISTAPRINT TECHNOLOGIES LTD. ______________________

2013-1261, -1550 ______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in consoli- dated Reexamination Nos. 90/009,295, 90/009,296, 90/009,313, and 90/009,315. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

JOHN A. DRAGSETH, Fish & Richardson P.C., of Min- neapolis, Minnesota, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was RICHARD J. ANDERSON.

MICHAEL S. FORMAN, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Acting Solicitor, and BRIAN T. RACILLA, Associate Solicitor. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, O’MALLEY, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 10, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court