Conti v. MSPB

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

______________________ ADAM CONTI, Petitioner, v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,

Respondent. ______________________ 2013-3071 ______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. NY0752090041-I-1.

______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________

DAVID RESTAINO, Fox Rothschild, LLP, of Lawrence- ville, New Jersey, argued for petitioner. With him on the brief was JOEL M. FERDINAND.

LINDSEY SCHRECKENGOST, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With her on the brief was BRYAN G. POLISUK, General Counsel.

______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, BRYSON, and MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 24, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Date Daniel E. O’Toole

Clerk of Court