Conti v. MSPB
Conti v. MSPB
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ADAM CONTI, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. ______________________ 2013-3071 ______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. NY0752090041-I-1. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ DAVID RESTAINO, Fox Rothschild, LLP, of Lawrence- ville, New Jersey, argued for petitioner. With him on the brief was JOEL M. FERDINAND.
LINDSEY SCHRECKENGOST, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With her on the brief was BRYAN G. POLISUK, General Counsel. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, BRYSON, and MOORE, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 24, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.