Brent v. USPS
Brent v. USPS
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
HORACE O. BRENT, SR., Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent. ______________________
2013-3072 ______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. CH0752100944-I-1. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
STEVEN J. PLOTKIN, Law Office of Steven J. Plotkin, of Evanston, Illinois, argued for petitioner.
JANE WALLACE VANNEMAN, Trial Attorney, Commer- cial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. On the brief were STUART F. DELERY, Assis- tant Attorney General, BRYANT G. SNEE, Acting Director, and MARTIN F. HOCKEY, JR., Assistant Director. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 24, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished