Michelotti v. United States
Michelotti v. United States
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
PAUL MICHELOTTI, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. ______________________
2013-5131 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 13-CV-0029, Chief Judge Emily C. Hewitt. ______________________
ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING ______________________
Before NEWMAN, LOURIE, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. ORDER A petition for panel rehearing having been filed by the appellant, and the matter having been referred to the panel that heard the appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 2 MICHELOTTI v. US
The petition for rehearing is DENIED, except that the portion of the opinion at page 7, lines 9-18, is replaced with the following: Apr. 23, 2013), ECF No. 8, he never tied those studies to his patent infringement claim or alleged how the studies showed infringement when he mentioned them indirectly and in passing in his motion to amend. Thus, the Court of Federal Claims had no fair opportunity to consider Mr. Michelotti’s new allegation. We note that the sin- gle document from the studies that he attached to his response to the motion to dismiss describes on- ly government simulations of enhanced brake lighting systems, not any actual systems used or manufactured by or for the United States. See App. to Pl.’s Resp. to Mot. to Dismiss.
FOR THE COURT
March 3, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
cc: Paul Michelotti Sonia M. Orfield
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished