Pujiang Talent Diamond Tools v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Pujiang Talent Diamond Tools v. United States

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

PUJIANG TALENT DIAMOND TOOLS CO., LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. ______________________

2013-1470 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in No. 11-CV-0146, Judge Richard K. Eaton. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

JOHN MATTHEW HOUKOM, Quintana Law Group, of Calabasas, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. On the brief was ANDRES F. QUINTANA.

ALEXANDER ORLANDO CANIZARES, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. On the brief were STUART F. DELERY, Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Director, PATRICIA M. MCCARTHY, Assistant Director, and JANE C. DEMPSEY, Trial Attorney. Of coun- sel on the brief was NATHANIEL J. HALVORSON, Attorney, Office of Chief Counsel for Import Administration, United States Department of Commerce, of Washington, DC. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, WALLACH, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 14, 2014 /s/Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished