K-Tech Telecommunications v. Blonder Tongue Laboratories
K-Tech Telecommunications v. Blonder Tongue Laboratories
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
K-TECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BLONDER TONGUE LABORATORIES, INC., R.L. DRAKE HOLDINGS, LLC, R.L. DRAKE, LLC, AND RLD69, LLC, Defendants-Appellees. ______________________
2013-1645 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 12-CV-5316, Judge R. Gary Klausner. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
PATRICK F. BRIGHT, Wagner, Anderson & Bright, P.C., of Glendale, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
JOHN C. MCNETT, Woodard, Emhardt, Moriarty, McNett & Henry LLP, of Indianapolis, Indiana, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was BLAKE R. HARTZ. Of counsel on the brief was FRANK C. CORSO, Corso Law LLC, of Rehoboth, Massachusetts. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
April 16, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished