K-Tech Telecommunications v. Blonder Tongue Laboratories
K-Tech Telecommunications v. Blonder Tongue Laboratories
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ K-TECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BLONDER TONGUE LABORATORIES, INC., R.L. DRAKE HOLDINGS, LLC, R.L. DRAKE, LLC, AND RLD69, LLC, Defendants-Appellees. ______________________ 2013-1645 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 12-CV-5316, Judge R. Gary Klausner. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ PATRICK F. BRIGHT, Wagner, Anderson & Bright, P.C., of Glendale, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
JOHN C. MCNETT, Woodard, Emhardt, Moriarty, McNett & Henry LLP, of Indianapolis, Indiana, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was BLAKE R. HARTZ. Of counsel on the brief was FRANK C.
CORSO, Corso Law LLC, of Rehoboth, Massachusetts. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
April 16, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.