Rambus Inc. v. Lee
Rambus Inc. v. Lee
Opinion
Case: 14-1133 Document: 18 Page: 1 Filed: 04/23/2014
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit IN RE RAMBUS INC. ______________________
2013-1426 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Reexamination Nos. 95/000,250 and 95/001,124.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IN RE RAMBUS, INC. ______________________
2014-1133 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 95/001,026 and 95/001,128.
______________________
ON MOTION ______________________
Before LOURIE, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit Judges. LOURIE, Circuit Judge. Case: 14-1133 Document: 18 Page: 2 Filed: 04/23/2014
2 IN RE RAMBUS INC.
ORDER Rambus Inc. and the Deputy Director of the U.S. Pa- tent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) jointly move to re- mand these cases to conduct further proceedings in light of Rambus Inc. v. Rea, 731 F.3d 1248 (Fed. Cir. 2013). In Rambus, this court vacated the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s obviousness rejection of claims of a related patent based on a combination of the same prior art references at issue here. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motions are granted. The cases are remanded to the Board to conduct further proceedings consistent with this order. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
FOR THE COURT
/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
ISSUED AS A MANDATE: April 23, 2014
s30
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished