NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS CORP., Appellant,

v.

ABATEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellee. ______________________

2013-1661 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Reexamination No. 95/001,362. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

AARON T. OLEJNICZAK, Andrus, Sceales, Starke & Sawall, LLP, of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, argued for appel- lant. With him on the brief was GEORGE H. SOLVESON.

D. CLAY HOLLOWAY, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were DEAN W. RUSSELL and RENAE BAILEY WAINWRIGHT. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, CLEVENGER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 12, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court