NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, Appellants,

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee,

AND

APPLE INC., Intervenor. ______________________

2013-1519 ______________________

Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-794. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for appellants. With him on the brief were KEVIN P. JOHNSON and VICTORIA F. MAROULIS, of Redwood Shores, Califor- nia; ALAN L. WHITEHURST, DEREK L. SHAFFER and MARISSA R. DUCCA, of Washington, DC; and THOMAS D. PEASE, of New York, New York. Of counsel were WILLIAM ADAMS and KATHLEEN M. SULLIVAN of New York, New York; PAUL F. BRINKMAN and SCOTT A. LASHER, of Washington, DC, and ROBERT JASON BECHER, of Los Angeles, California.

CLARK S. CHENEY, Attorney, Office of General Coun- sel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were DOMINIC L. BIANCHI, General Counsel, and WAYNE W. HERRINGTON, Assistant General Counsel.

WILLIAM F. LEE, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for interve- nor. With him on the brief were RICHARD W. O’NEILL and JOSEPH J. MUELLER; MARK D. SELWYN, of Palo Alto, Cali- fornia; JAMES L. QUARLES III, NINA S. TALLON and GREGORY H. LANTIER, of Washington, DC; and JAMES M. DOWD, of Los Angeles, California. Of counsel were MARK C. FLEMING and LAUREN B. FLETCHER, of Boston, Massa- chusetts. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, MAYER, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 14, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court