Everist v. Agriculture
Everist v. Agriculture
Opinion
Case: 14-1358 Document: 21 Page: 1 Filed: 05/30/2014
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ DAVID D. EVERIST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE, DONNA MICKLEY, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, DAYNE BARRON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF U.S. AND DOUGLAS FONG, Defendants-Appellees, AND CITY OF MEDFORD, OREGON, MARK D. CLARKE, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE, AND OWEN M. PANNER, Defendants. ______________________ 2014-1358 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon in No. 1:14-cv-00199-CL, Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clark. ______________________ ON MOTION ______________________ PER CURIAM.
Case: 14-1358 Document: 21 Page: 2 Filed: 05/30/2014
2 EVERIST v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
ORDER This court considers whether this appeal should be transferred due to lack of jurisdiction.
David D. Everist appeals a decision from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon that dismissed his complaint appearing to allege violations under the Federal Land Policy Management Act and Executive Order # 12630. This court is a court of limited jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. § 1295. Based only upon our review, it is not clear that the District of Oregon’s juris- diction arose in whole or in part under the laws governing this court’s appellate jurisdiction.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) Everist is directed to show cause within 21 days from the date of this order why his appeal should not be transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631. The appel- lees are also directed to respond within that time. (2) The briefing schedule is stayed.
FOR THE COURT /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court s24
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.