Tse v. Google Inc.
Tse v. Google Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ HO KEUNG TSE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOOGLE INC., SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA LLC, HTC AMERICA, INC., AND BLOCKBUSTER, INC., Defendants-Appellees. ______________________ 2014-1222 ______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 13-cv-00194, Judge Susan Y. Illston. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ HO KEUNG, TSE, of Cheung Sha, Hong Kong, pro se.
STEPHANIE P. SKAFF, Farella Braun + Martel LLP, of San Francisco, California, for Google, Inc. With her on the brief were DEEPAK GUPTA; BIJAL VAKIL and ERIC KRAUSE, White & Case LLP, of Palo Alto, California, for Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC; JERRY R. SELINGER, Patterson & Sheridan, LLP, of Dallas, Texas for HTC America, Inc.; and SCOTT LLEWELLYN, Morrison & Foerster LLP, of Denver, Colorado, for Blockbuster, LLC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LINN and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
July 16, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.