Gandhi v. Bandl-Konrad

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Gandhi v. Bandl-Konrad

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

HAREN S. GANDHI, JOHN VITO CAVATAIO, ROBERT HENRY HAMMERLE, AND YISUN CHENG, Appellants,

v.

BRIGITTE BANDL-KONRAD, ANDREAS HERTZBERG, BERND KRUTZSCH, ARNO NOLTE, MARKUS PAULE, STEFAN RENFFTLEN, NORBERT WALDBUESSER, MICHEL WEIBEL, GUENTER WENNINGER, AND ROLF WUNSCH, Appellees. ______________________

2014-1087 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 105,839. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

E. ANTHONY FIGG, Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C., of Washington, DC, argued for appellants. With him on the brief was R. DANNY HUNTINGTON.

MICHAEL H. JACOBS, Crowell & Mornig LLP, of Wash- ington, DC, argued for appellees. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, SCHALL and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 17, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished