Gandhi v. Bandl-Konrad
Gandhi v. Bandl-Konrad
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ HAREN S. GANDHI, JOHN VITO CAVATAIO, ROBERT HENRY HAMMERLE, AND YISUN CHENG, Appellants, v. BRIGITTE BANDL-KONRAD, ANDREAS HERTZBERG, BERND KRUTZSCH, ARNO NOLTE, MARKUS PAULE, STEFAN RENFFTLEN, NORBERT WALDBUESSER, MICHEL WEIBEL, GUENTER WENNINGER, AND ROLF WUNSCH, Appellees. ______________________ 2014-1087 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 105,839. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ E. ANTHONY FIGG, Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C., of Washington, DC, argued for appellants. With him on the brief was R. DANNY HUNTINGTON.
MICHAEL H. JACOBS, Crowell & Mornig LLP, of Wash- ington, DC, argued for appellees. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, SCHALL and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
July 17, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.