Multimedia Patent Trust v. Apple Inc.
Multimedia Patent Trust v. Apple Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MULTIMEDIA PATENT TRUST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. APPLE INC., LG ELECTRONICS, INC., LG ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM U.S.A., INC., AND LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC. Defendants-Appellees. ______________________ 2013-1620 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in No. 10-CV-2618, Judge Marilyn L. Huff. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ KATHLEEN M. SULLIVAN, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plain- tiff-appellant. With her on the brief were SANFORD I.
WEISBURST; PHILIP C. STERNHELL, of Washington, DC; and FREDERICK A. LORIG, SUSAN R. ESTRICH, CHRISTOPHER A.
MATHEWS, and BRUCE R. ZISSER, of Los Angeles, Califor- nia.
GREGORY A. CASTANIAS, Jones Day, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee Apple Inc. With him on the brief were JENNIFER L. SWIZE; WILLIAM C.
ROOKLIDGE, of Irvine California; and MARRON A.
MAHONEY, of Chicago, Illinois.
JUSTIN BARNES, Fish & Richardson P.C., of San Diego, California, argued for defendants-appellees LG Electron- ics, Inc., et al. With him on the brief were LARA S.
GARNER; MICHAEL J. MCKEON, of Washington, DC; and FRANK P. PORCELLI, of Boston, Massachusetts. Of counsel were FRANCIS J. ALBERT, and JUANITA ROSE BROOKS, of San Diego, California; RICHARD ALEX STERBA, of Washing- ton, DC; and KELLY CATHERINE HUNSAKER, of Redwood City, California. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MOORE, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
July 17, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.