Capital Machine Company v. Miller Veneers
Capital Machine Company v. Miller Veneers
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
CAPITAL MACHINE COMPANY, INC., AND INDIANA FORGE, LLC, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants,
AND
WILLIAM L. KOSS, Counterclaim Defendant,
v.
MILLER VENEERS, INC., THOMAS A. MILLER, BENJAMIN R. MILLER, SALLY M. SANDO, ROBERT D. BRAND, INDIANAPOLIS VENEER WORKS, LLC, EGENOLF MACHINE, INC., AND MERRITT PLYWOOD MACHINERY, INC., Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellees. ______________________
2014-1171 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana in No. 1:09-cv-00702-JMS- DML, Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________ PAUL B. OVERHAUSER, Overhauser Law Offices, LLC, of Greenfield, Indiana, argued for plaintiffs/counterclaim defendants-appellants.
MICHAEL A. SWIFT, Maginot, Moore & Beck, LLP, of Indianapolis, Indiana, argued for defend- ants/counterclaimants-appellees. Of counsel on the brief were J. LEE MCNEELY, CYNTHIA A. BEDRICK, and CHARLES B. DAUGHERTY, McNeely Stephenson Thopy & Harrold, of Shelbyville, Indiana. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, O’MALLEY, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
August 7, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished