Capital Machine Company v. Miller Veneers

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Capital Machine Company v. Miller Veneers

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

CAPITAL MACHINE COMPANY, INC., AND INDIANA FORGE, LLC, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants,

AND

WILLIAM L. KOSS, Counterclaim Defendant,

v.

MILLER VENEERS, INC., THOMAS A. MILLER, BENJAMIN R. MILLER, SALLY M. SANDO, ROBERT D. BRAND, INDIANAPOLIS VENEER WORKS, LLC, EGENOLF MACHINE, INC., AND MERRITT PLYWOOD MACHINERY, INC., Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellees. ______________________

2014-1171 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana in No. 1:09-cv-00702-JMS- DML, Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________ PAUL B. OVERHAUSER, Overhauser Law Offices, LLC, of Greenfield, Indiana, argued for plaintiffs/counterclaim defendants-appellants.

MICHAEL A. SWIFT, Maginot, Moore & Beck, LLP, of Indianapolis, Indiana, argued for defend- ants/counterclaimants-appellees. Of counsel on the brief were J. LEE MCNEELY, CYNTHIA A. BEDRICK, and CHARLES B. DAUGHERTY, McNeely Stephenson Thopy & Harrold, of Shelbyville, Indiana. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, O’MALLEY, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 7, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished