U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2014

Capital Machine Company v. Miller Veneers

Capital Machine Company v. Miller Veneers
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided August 7, 2014

Capital Machine Company v. Miller Veneers

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CAPITAL MACHINE COMPANY, INC., AND INDIANA FORGE, LLC, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants, AND WILLIAM L. KOSS, Counterclaim Defendant, v. MILLER VENEERS, INC., THOMAS A. MILLER, BENJAMIN R. MILLER, SALLY M. SANDO, ROBERT D. BRAND, INDIANAPOLIS VENEER WORKS, LLC, EGENOLF MACHINE, INC., AND MERRITT PLYWOOD MACHINERY, INC., Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellees. ______________________ 2014-1171 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana in No. 1:09-cv-00702-JMS- DML, Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ PAUL B. OVERHAUSER, Overhauser Law Offices, LLC, of Greenfield, Indiana, argued for plaintiffs/counterclaim defendants-appellants.

MICHAEL A. SWIFT, Maginot, Moore & Beck, LLP, of Indianapolis, Indiana, argued for defend- ants/counterclaimants-appellees. Of counsel on the brief were J. LEE MCNEELY, CYNTHIA A. BEDRICK, and CHARLES B. DAUGHERTY, McNeely Stephenson Thopy & Harrold, of Shelbyville, Indiana. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, O’MALLEY, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 7, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.