T.M. Patents v. Cisco Systems

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

T.M. Patents v. Cisco Systems

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

T.M. PATENTS, L.P., AND T.M. CREDITORS LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ______________________

2014-1161 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in No. 1:12-cv-11418-WGY, Judge William G. Young. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

STEPHEN J. DRISCOLL, Saul Ewing, LLP, of Philadel- phia, Pennsylvania, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Of counsel was JOEY TSU-YI CHEN, of Baltimore, Maryland.

J. ANTHONY DOWNS, Goodwin Procter LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were DANIEL M. FORMAN and LANA S. SHIFERMAN. Of counsel on the brief were JOHN C. O’QUINN and JASON M. WILCOX, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, of Washington, DC. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 8, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished