T.M. Patents v. Cisco Systems
T.M. Patents v. Cisco Systems
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ T.M. PATENTS, L.P., AND T.M. CREDITORS LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ______________________ 2014-1161 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in No. 1:12-cv-11418-WGY, Judge William G. Young. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ STEPHEN J. DRISCOLL, Saul Ewing, LLP, of Philadel- phia, Pennsylvania, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Of counsel was JOEY TSU-YI CHEN, of Baltimore, Maryland.
J. ANTHONY DOWNS, Goodwin Procter LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were DANIEL M. FORMAN and LANA S.
SHIFERMAN. Of counsel on the brief were JOHN C.
O’QUINN and JASON M. WILCOX, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, of Washington, DC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
August 8, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.