Invista North America v. M&G Polymers USA

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Invista North America v. M&G Polymers USA

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

INVISTA NORTH AMERICA S.A.R.L., Plaintiff-Appellee,

AND

AURIGA POLYMERS INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

M&G POLYMERS USA LLC AND M&G USA CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellants. ______________________

2014-1432 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:11-cv-01007-SLR-CJB, Judge Sue L. Robinson. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

MEGAN D. DORTENZO, Thompson Hine LLP, of Cleve- land, Ohio, argued for defendants-appellants. With her on the brief was ARTHUR P. LICYGIEWICZ. Of counsel on the brief were WILLIAM P. ATKINS and CHRISTOPHER K. DORSEY, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, of McLean, Virginia.

WILLIAM J. MARSDEN, JR., Fish & Richardson P.C., of Wilmington, Delaware, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. With him on the brief for INVISTA North America S.a.r.l. were DOUGLAS E. MCCANN, MARTINA TYREUS HUFNAL, ROBERT M. OAKES, and MICHELLE NEROZZI-ANKENBRAND. On the brief for Auriga Polymers Inc. were JOHN W. SHAW and JEFFREY T. CASTELLANO, Shaw Keller LLP, of Wil- mington, Delaware.

______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 13, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished