Case: 14-1379 Document: 25 Page: 1 Filed: 08/28/2014

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ISAAC A. POTTER, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROBERTA S. BREN AND OBLON SPIVAK, Defendants-Appellees, AND MICHELLE K. LEE, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, AND LINDA M. KING, Defendants-Appellees.

______________________ 2014-1379 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in No. 1:13-cv-01417-CMH- IDD, Senior Judge Claude M. Hilton.

--------------------------------------------------------------------- ISAAC A. POTTER, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Case: 14-1379 Document: 25 Page: 2 Filed: 08/28/2014

2 POTTER v. BREN

ROBERTA S. BREN AND OBLON SPIVAK, Defendants-Appellees, AND MICHELLE K. LEE, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, AND LINDA M. KING, Defendants-Appellees. ______________________ 2014-1505 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in No. 1:13-cv-01417-CMH- IDD, Senior Judge Claude M. Hilton. ______________________ PER CURIAM.

ORDER On July 24, 2014, this court dismissed-in-part and af- firmed-in-part the above-captioned appeals. Mr. Potter has now filed a “Motion for an Order to Show Cause,” a “Motion to Challenge Jurisdiction in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit,” and a “Motion for Relief from Judgment.”

To the extent that Mr. Potter is seeking reconsidera- tion of this court’s July 24, 2014 order, he has not shown entitlement to relief.

Accordingly, Case: 14-1379 Document: 25 Page: 3 Filed: 08/28/2014

POTTER v. BREN 3

IT IS ORDERED THAT: All pending motions are denied.

FOR THE COURT /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s30