NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE PACTIV LLC ______________________ 2014-1066, -1067, -1068, -1069, -1070 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 90/011,132, 90/010,976, 90/011,128, 90/011,130, and 90/011,131. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ DANIEL H. SHULMAN, Reynolds Group Holdings, Ltd., of Lake Forest, Illinois, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was JOHN C. GATZ, Nixon Peabody LLP, of Chi- cago, Illinois.

AMY J. NELSON, Associate Solicitor, United States Pa- tent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, argued for appellee. With her on the brief were NATHAN K.

KELLEY, Solicitor, SCOTT C. WEIDENFELLER, Senior Coun- sel for Patent Law and Litigation, and ROBERT J.

MCMANUS, Associate Solicitor. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 15, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court