Hitachi Consumer Electronics v. Top Victory Electronics
Hitachi Consumer Electronics v. Top Victory Electronics
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ HITACHI CONSUMER ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., AND HITACHI ADVANCED DIGITAL, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TOP VICTORY ELECTRONICS (TAIWAN) CO., LTD., TPV INTERNATIONAL (USA), INC., ENVISION PERIPHERALS, INC., TOP VICTORY ELECTRONICS (FUJIAN) CO. LTD., TPV ELECTRONICS (FUJIAN) CO. LTD., AND TPV TECHNOLOGY LTD., Defendants-Appellees. ______________________ 2014-1047 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 2:10-cv-00260-JRG, Judge J. Rodney Gilstrap. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ DEANNE E. MAYNARD, Morrison & Foerster LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With her on the brief were MARC A. HEARRON and JESSICA E.
PALMER; A. MAX OLSON and DAVID L. FEHRMAN, of Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan. Of counsel on the brief were MARTIN J. BLACK, JEFFREY B. PLIES, ROBERT W.
ASHBROOK, JR., and VINCENT A. GALLO, Dechert LLP, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
JONATHAN D. HACKER, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were MARK A. SAMUELS and BRIAN BERLINER, of Los Angeles, California. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit Judg- es).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
September 15, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.