In Re: Target Training International
In Re: Target Training International
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE TARGET TRAINING INTERNATIONAL, LTD. ______________________
2014-1201 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Reexamination No. 90/011,434. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
EDMUND J. SEASE, McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C., of Des Moines, Iowa, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was CHRISTINE LEBRÓN-DYKEMAN.
MEREDITH H. SCHOENFELD, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With her on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor, SCOTT C. WEIDENFELLER, Senior Counsel for Patent Law & Litigation, and JOSEPH MATAL, Associate Solicitor. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, REYNA and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
September 16, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished