NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IN RE TECHSHELL, INC. ______________________

2014-1179 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Reexamination No. 95/001,767. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

ROBERT B. DULANEY, III, Smith Risley Tempel Santos, of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for appellant. On the brief was SCOTT A. HORSTEMEYER, Thomas|Horstemeyer LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia. Of counsel were NORMAN A. CRAIN and DAN R. GRESHAM.

MEREDITH H. SCHOENFELD, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for intervenor. With her on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor, and MONICA B. LATEEF, Associate Solicitor. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, TARANTO and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 17, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court