NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE TECHSHELL, INC. ______________________ 2014-1179 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Reexamination No. 95/001,767. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ ROBERT B. DULANEY, III, Smith Risley Tempel Santos, of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for appellant. On the brief was SCOTT A. HORSTEMEYER, Thomas|Horstemeyer LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia. Of counsel were NORMAN A. CRAIN and DAN R. GRESHAM.

MEREDITH H. SCHOENFELD, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for intervenor. With her on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor, and MONICA B.

LATEEF, Associate Solicitor. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, TARANTO and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 17, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court