Case: 14-1649 Document: 13 Page: 1 Filed: 09/19/2014

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IN RE SCREENIVAS KRISHNAN, KOEN BENNEBROEK, KARTHIK BHAT, STEFANO A. PESCADOR, DAVID G. REED, BRAD W. SIMERAL, AND EDWARD M. VEESER ______________________

2014-1649 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 11/610,411. ______________________

ON MOTION ______________________ Before O’MALLEY, WALLACH, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges. O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge. ORDER The Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) moves without opposition to remand this case to the PTO for further proceedings. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board affirmed the Exam- iner’s rejection of certain claims, but the PTO concedes that the Board should reconsider its rejection in light of the PTO’s examination policy on “configured to” claim lan- guage. Case: 14-1649 Document: 13 Page: 2 Filed: 09/19/2014

2 IN RE KRISHNAN

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. This case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this order. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s30 ISSUED AS A MANDATE: September 19, 2014