U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2014

Woodley v. United States

Woodley v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided September 25, 2014

Woodley v. United States

Opinion

Case: 14-5106 Document: 38 Page: 1 Filed: 09/25/2014

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ GORDON ARTHUR WOODLEY AND DENISE LYNN WOODLEY, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DANIEL HAGGART AND KATHY HAGGART, FOR THEMSELVES AND AS REPRESENTATIVES OF A CLASS OF SIMILARLY SITUATED PERSONS, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. ______________________ 2014-5106 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:09-cv-00103-CFL, Judge Charles F.

Lettow. ______________________ ON MOTION ______________________ Case: 14-5106 Document: 38 Page: 2 Filed: 09/25/2014

2 WOODLEY v. US

PER CURIAM.

ORDER Faramarz Ghoddoussi and Bellevue Door & Millwork Company have filed “notices” with the court. Daniel Haggart et al. move to strike these letters. Ghoddoussi and Bellevue Door move for leave to respond and oppose the motion to strike.

Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motions to strike are deferred for consideration by the merits panel that is assigned to hear this case.

Copies of this order and the parties’ filings at Docket Nos. 24, 25, and 27-34 shall be transmitted to that panel.

FOR THE COURT /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court s24

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.