Brickey v. amazon.com
Brickey v. amazon.com
Opinion
Case: 14-1706 Document: 2 Page: 1 Filed: 10/07/2014
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
HERMAN LEON BRICKEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
AMAZON.COM AND CDBABY.COM, Defendants-Appellees,
AND
JEFFORY BEZOS, PRESIDENT, PARTNER, CD UNIVERSE, AND REBECCA VALADEZ, Defendants. ______________________
2014-1706 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas in No. 5:13-cv-00961-XR, Judge Xavier Rodriguez. ______________________
Before PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and MOORE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. ORDER Case: 14-1706 Document: 2 Page: 2 Filed: 10/07/2014
2 BRICKEY v. AMAZON.COM
Upon review of the docket, we determine that this ap- peal must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The case in the district court involves claims, inter alia, of copyright infringement. It does not involve claims of patent infringement. This court is a court of limited jurisdiction, which does not include jurisdiction over this appeal. 28 U.S.C. § 1295. Although we may transfer an appeal to a court that would have jurisdiction if an appeal could have been brought in that other court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631, we note that the district court has not yet entered a final judgment in the case. Thus, transfer to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is not appropriate here because the appeal could not “have been brought at the time it was filed.” 28 U.S.C. § 1631. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. FOR THE COURT
/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
s26
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished