Advanced Technology & Material v. United States
Advanced Technology & Material v. United States
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY & MATERIALS CO., LTD., BEIJING GANG YAN DIAMOND PRODUCTS COMPANY, AND GANG YAN DIAMOND PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, AND BOSUN TOOLS GROUP CO., LTD., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, AND DIAMOND SAWBLADES MANUFACTURERS COALITION, Defendant-Appellee, AND WEIHAI XIANGGUANG MECHANICAL INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., AND QINGDAO SHINHAN DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., Defendants. ______________________ 2014-1154 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in No. 1:09-cv-00511-RKM, Senior Judge R. Kenton Musgrave. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ HERBERT C. SHELLEY, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief was CHRISTOPHER G. FALCONE. Of coun- sel on the brief was JEFFREY S. NEELEY, Barnes, Richard- son & Colburn, LLP, of Washington, DC.
DANIEL B. PICKARD, Wiley Rein LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was MAUREEN E. THORSON. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MOORE, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
October 24, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.