In Re: Howard
In Re: Howard
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE MAUREEN A. HOWARD ______________________
2014-1137 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Serial No. 11/209,266. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
ROBERT R. AXENFELD, O’Kelly Ernst & Bielli, LLC, of Wilmington, Delaware, argued for appellant.
MICHAEL S. FORMAN, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor, and FRANCES M. LYNCH, Associate Solicitor. Of counsel was JEREMIAH HELM, Associate Solicitor. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (TARANTO, BRYSON, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
November 13, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished