Hill v. MSPB
Hill v. MSPB
Opinion
Case: 14-3216 Document: 12 Page: 1 Filed: 11/21/2014
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
JIMMY R. HILL, Petitioner,
v.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. ______________________
2014-3216 ______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. AT-3443-14-0778-I-1. ______________________
ON MOTION ______________________
ORDER The United States Postal Service (“USPS”) moves to reform the official caption to designate the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) as the respondent, and for an extension of time for the Board to file its response brief 21 days from the date of disposition of this motion. The USPS states that Jimmy R. Hill opposes. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is desig- nated as the respondent when the Board’s decision con- Case: 14-3216 Document: 12 Page: 2 Filed: 11/21/2014
2 HILL v. MSPB
cerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The employing agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. Here, the Board dismissed Hill’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this petition for review. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion to reform the caption is granted. The revised official caption is reflected above. (2) The motion for an extension of time to file the re- sponse brief is granted to the extent that the Board should calculate the due date for its brief from the date of filing of this order. FOR THE COURT
/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
s21
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished