In Re: Engleman
In Re: Engleman
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE EDGAR G. ENGLEMAN, RONALD LEVY, FRANK J. HSU AND CLAUDIA BENIKE. ______________________
2014-1230 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Serial No. 08/575,432. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
VICKI S. VEENKER, Veenker Law Offices, of Palo Alto, California, argued for appellants. With her on the brief were DAVID A. ROISE, VLP Law Group LLP, of Palo Alto, California; and WILLIAM R. ZIMMERMAN and JONATHAN E. BACHAND, Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, of Wash- ington, DC.
KRISTI L. R. SAWERT, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia argued for appellee. With her on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor, and JAMIE L. SIMPSON, Associate Solicitor. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, REYNA, and HUGHES, Circuit Judg- es). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
December 4, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished