NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IN RE RICHARD A. GRAFF ______________________

2014-1288 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Serial No. 10/885,569. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

MICHAEL K. MUTTER, Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch, of Falls Church, Virginia, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was D. RICHARD ANDERSON. Of counsel on the brief was PETER K. TRYNA, Peter K. Trzyna Law Office P.C., of Chicago, Illinois.

JOSEPH MATEL, Associate Solicitor, United States Pa- tent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Deputy Solici- tor, and AMY J. NELSON, Associate Solicitor. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, BRYSON, and O’MALLEY, Cir- cuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 8, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court