Mauna Kea Technologies v. Anticancer, Inc.
Mauna Kea Technologies v. Anticancer, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
MAUNA KEA TECHNOLOGIES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ANTICANCER, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ______________________
2014-1412 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in No. 3:11-cv-01407-CAB- JMA, Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JEFFREY M. GOEHRING, Young & Thompson, of Alex- andria, Virginia, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was DOUGLAS V. RIGLER.
MATT VALENTI, AntiCancer, Inc., of San Diego, Cali- fornia, argued for defendant-appellee. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (MOORE, REYNA, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
December 10, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished