Mauna Kea Technologies v. Anticancer, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Mauna Kea Technologies v. Anticancer, Inc.

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

MAUNA KEA TECHNOLOGIES, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

ANTICANCER, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ______________________

2014-1412 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in No. 3:11-cv-01407-CAB- JMA, Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

JEFFREY M. GOEHRING, Young & Thompson, of Alex- andria, Virginia, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was DOUGLAS V. RIGLER.

MATT VALENTI, AntiCancer, Inc., of San Diego, Cali- fornia, argued for defendant-appellee. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, REYNA, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 10, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished