Jones v. MSPB
Jones v. MSPB
Opinion
Case: 14-3072 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 05/02/2014
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
MARIA LAVINIA JONES, Petitioner,
v.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. ______________________
2014-3072 ______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. CB-7121-13-0111-V-1. ______________________
ON MOTION ______________________
ORDER The Department of Energy moves to reform the official caption to name the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) as the proper respondent, and for a 21 day extension of time, for the Board to file its opening brief. Maria Lavinia Jones opposes. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is desig- nated as the respondent when the Board’s decision con- cerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The Case: 14-3072 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 05/02/2014
2 JONES v. MSPB
employing agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. Here, the Board dismissed Maria Lavinia Jones’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this petition for review. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion to reform the caption is granted. The revised official caption is reflected above. (2) The Board’s informal response brief is due within 21 days from the date of filing of this order. FOR THE COURT
/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
s21
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished