U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2014

Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided July 24, 2014 · Dyk, Hughes, Lourie, Malley, Moore, Newman, Prost, Reyna, Wallach

571 F. App'x 958

Counsel

Seth P. Waxman, Thomas Saunders, Thomas Gregory Sprankling, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Elizabeth D. Ferrill, Kara F. Stoll, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC, G. Mark Edgarton, Esq., Robert S. Frank, Jr., Carlos Perezs Albuerne, Esq., Choate, Hall & Stewart LLP, Mark Christopher Fleming, Eric Fletcher, Lauren B. Fletcher, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale And Dorr LLP, Boston, MA, David H. Judson, Law Offices of David H. Judson, Dallas, TX, Jennifer Swan, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants., Aaron M. Panner, Michael E. Joffre, John Christopher Rozendaal, Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, P.L.L.C., Washington, DC, Alexander Fraser Mackinnon, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Dion D. Messer, Esq., Limelight Networks, Inc., Tempe, AZ, Young Jin Park, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, New York, NY, for Defendant-Cross-Appellant.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On June 2, 2014, the Supreme Court reversed with costs the judgment of this court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

Accordingly,

It is Ordered That:

1. The mandate of this court issued on November 5, 2012 is recalled, the appeals are reinstated, and this court’s judgment is vacated.

2. Pursuant to IOP # 14, the en banc court has determined to dissolve its en banc status and refer the case to the two *959remaining panel members and a newly-selected judge.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.