U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2014

Zhejiang Layo Wood Industry Co. v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided August 18, 2014

576 F. App'x 1000

Counsel

Gregory S. Menegaz, Esq., Dekieffer & Horgan, PLLC, Washington, DC, Kristin Heim Mowry, Jill A. Cramer, Jeffrey S. Grimson, Daniel Robert Wilson, Attorney, Sarah M. Wyss, Mowry & Grimson, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee., Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of Justice International Trade Field Office, New York, NY, Jeffrey Steven Levin, Esq., Counsel, Levin Trade Law PC, Bethesda, MD, for Defendant-Appellant.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Ltd. v. United States (United States Court of International Trade 2016)
Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co. v. United States (United States Court of International Trade 2015)
Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co. v. United States (United States Court of International Trade 2015)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION

ORDER

The Coalition for American Hardwood Parity moves without opposition to volun*1001tarily dismiss this appeal pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b).

Upon consideration thereof, It Is OrDERED That:

(1) The motion is granted.

(2) Zhejiang Layo Wood Industry Co., Ltd.’s motion for summary affirmance is denied as moot.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.