Guzik Technical Enterprises v. Western Digital Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Guzik Technical Enterprises v. Western Digital Corporation

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION, WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., WESTERN DIGITAL (FREMONT) INC., WESTERN DIGITAL (THAILAND) COMPANY LIMITED, AND WESTERN DIGITAL (MALAYSIA) SDN.BHD., Defendants-Appellees. ______________________

2014-1421 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 5:11-cv-03786-PSG, Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

A. MARISA CHUN, McDermott, Will & Emery, LLP, of Menlo Park, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With her on the brief were DANIEL E. ALBERTI and ERIC W. HAGEN. Of counsel were M. MILLER BAKER, of Wash- ington, DC, and NATALIE A. BENNETT, of Chicago, Illinois. DOUGLAS E. LUMISH, Latham & Watkins, LLP, of Menlo Park, California argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were RICHARD G. FRENKEL and MICHELLE P. WOODHOUSE; and JAMES L. DAY, of San Francisco, CA. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, BRYSON, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 9, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished