Guzik Technical Enterprises v. Western Digital Corporation
Guzik Technical Enterprises v. Western Digital Corporation
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION, WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., WESTERN DIGITAL (FREMONT) INC., WESTERN DIGITAL (THAILAND) COMPANY LIMITED, AND WESTERN DIGITAL (MALAYSIA) SDN.BHD., Defendants-Appellees. ______________________ 2014-1421 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 5:11-cv-03786-PSG, Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ A. MARISA CHUN, McDermott, Will & Emery, LLP, of Menlo Park, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
With her on the brief were DANIEL E. ALBERTI and ERIC W. HAGEN. Of counsel were M. MILLER BAKER, of Wash- ington, DC, and NATALIE A. BENNETT, of Chicago, Illinois.
DOUGLAS E. LUMISH, Latham & Watkins, LLP, of Menlo Park, California argued for defendants-appellees.
With him on the brief were RICHARD G. FRENKEL and MICHELLE P. WOODHOUSE; and JAMES L. DAY, of San Francisco, CA. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, BRYSON, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
January 9, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.