Briese Lichttechnik Vertriebs v. Langton
Briese Lichttechnik Vertriebs v. Langton
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ BRIESE LICHTTECHNIK VERTRIEBS GMBH, AND HANS-WERNER BRIESE, Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellants, v. BRENT LANGTON, B2PRO, KEY LIGHTING, INC., SERGIO ORTIZ, AND EDWARD C. SCHEWE, Defendants-Appellants. ______________________ 2014-1253, -1265 ______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 1:09-CV-09790-SC- MHD, Trial Judge Samuel Conti. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ GARY SERBIN, Hogan Lovells US LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiffs-cross-appellants. With him on the brief were ERIC J. LOBENFELD, NICOLE NUSSBAUM; and FREDERICK LIU of Washington, DC.
EDWARD C. SCHEWE, Schewe & Associates, of Manhat- tan Beach, California, argued for defendants-appellants. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, O’MALLEY and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
January 9, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.