NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IN RE DAVID M. PROKOP ______________________

2014-1423 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in serial No. 90/012,124. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

KEVIN A. ZECK, Perkins Coie LLP, of Seattle, Wash- ington, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was RAMSEY M. AL-SALAM.

MARY L. KELLY, Associate Solicitor, United States Pa- tent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With her on the brief were Nathan K. Kelley, Solicitor, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Deputy Solicitor, and FARHEENA Y. RASHEED, Associate Solicitor. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (WALLACH, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 12, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court